I agree that the development of a device which can work continously has similarities with the development of the IC engine. Remarkable is that almost all energy in the most recently developed system is released in the form of light.
Peter From: Jed Rothwell Sent: Monday, August 11, 2014 8:10 PM To: vortex-l@eskimo.com Subject: Re: [Vo]:Re: BLP picks up another 11 M from investors <pjvannoor...@caiway.nl> wrote: The theory of R.Mills corrects a crucial flaw in the current atomic model. In R.Mills theory the electron is not described as a pointsource but as an extended current which flows in such a way that stable solutions of the Maxwell equations arise which correspond to the normal quantum levels. I am aware of that. I cannot judge the theory, but my point is that having a theory is not, in itself, proof that your experimental claims are true. The theory might be right while the experiments are wrong. Or vice versa. Or they might both be wrong. There is really no connection, until such time as the theory makes many successful predictions and allows control and scale up of the reaction. That has not happened with Mills yet. In his latest tests he is running small explosions. This is far from having a controlled energy producing device. Granted it might lead to such devices, perhaps similar to the way periodically exploding gasoline in an internal combustion engine produces continuous vehicle propulsion. - Jed
