In reply to Jones Beene's message of Wed, 13 Aug 2014 07:11:56 -0700: Hi, [snip] >Should have added this. > >In the Naudts paper often quoted by Fran Roarty, the author shows that one >can make a good argument in favor of a deep fractional ground state: which >we can call f/H (the hydrino-state is trademarked) using only the standard >theory of relativistic quantum mechanics. Mills actual theory can be seen as >superfluous, in that regard - at least as far as the deep state of f/H is >concerned - as is his rejection of QM. > >IOW - the Klein-Gordon equation has a low-lying eigenstate with square >integrable wavefunction. The corresponding spinor solution of Diracs >equation is apparently not square integrable.
I suspect that the "unreal" QM solutions would become real if they dropped the notion that spin is an intrinsic property of the electron and has a fixed value. Regards, Robin van Spaandonk http://rvanspaa.freehostia.com/project.html
