Hello Jones I already asked Zeilinger a few years ago after i read his book No respons.
The whole thing boils down to the stucture of the electron and photon. If the electron/photon are is described as a point particles no classical explanation can be given for the quantum entanglement. Peter From: Jones Beene Sent: Monday, August 11, 2014 9:52 PM To: vortex-l@eskimo.com Subject: RE: [Vo]:Re: BLP picks up another 11 M from investors Hello Peter, I have to chuckle that you would quote Mills’ GIGO presentation of Aspect here as if there was any validity to it at all. Mills should have removed this from his book years ago. It is shockingly wrong. First, the Aspect experiment is old, flawed and long since upgraded, and secondly Mills did not explain the underlying phenomenon in any significant way. In effect, Mills addressed an erroneous interpretation of a long-abandoned experiment. As one of my favorite blog commentators quipped: “You do know that EPR-type experiments have progressed SIGNIFICANTLY beyond the Aspect experiment, and that more accurate tests by Zeilinger have produced even more accurate confirmation of QM, don't you? If you are not aware of this, maybe you should do some more literature search first and then get back to us if you still are not convinced…” Mills, in contrast, has no fully independent proof of CQM (but admittedly his theory does have its strong points). Mills always has tentacles attached to third parties, and therefore there is no independent confirmation of any useful portion of it. Which makes this Chapter 37 no more than tripe, in need of strong revision. Mills must have stopped his study of QM in the last century. Please, do not take my word for it – ask Zeilinger or any other QM expert what he thinks of CQM. (and hope that you do not get insulted). http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anton_Zeilinger From: pjvannoor...@caiway.nl Hello Jones This is Mills explanation of the quantum entanglement: http://www.blacklightpower.com/theory-2/theory/aspect-experiment/ The crux is that electrons and photons must have a different structure to explain these results in a classical way. By accepting that the structure of electrons and photons are different all the predicted strange quantum effects disappear and the results of every experiment can be explained classically. Peter From: Jones Beene From: pjvannoorden As a consequence of this new atomic theory of R.Mills all the strange effects in the current quantum theory (like spooky action at a distance… disappear. Everything becomes calculable. What? Please explain how quantum entanglement is fully explained by Mills’ theory. The most spooky thing about Mills is this magical hold which he has on otherwise intelligent scientists – which somehow draws them into believing this kind of bogosity. Jones
