You are confusing me. First you say that Mills, on your blog, was a person other than Robin van Spaandonk to offer a theory explaining He ash in amounts that match excess heat that is consistent with hydrino production and then you _appear_ (poor grammar so hard tell) to say that Mills has no such theory.
Which is it? On Tue, Sep 16, 2014 at 1:10 PM, Peter Gluck <peter.gl...@gmail.com> wrote: > the absence of theory means Randy thinks NO connection. > To be discussed with him. > Peter > > On Tue, Sep 16, 2014 at 9:07 PM, James Bowery <jabow...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> According to Google, there is only one hit for helium and mills on the >> egoout blog: >> >> http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com/2013_11_01_archive.html >> >> and it does not contain any such theory. >> >> >> >> On Tue, Sep 16, 2014 at 12:51 PM, Peter Gluck <peter.gl...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >>> Jed >>> I answered to James, his hope is in Robin van Spaandonk. >>> to link hydrinos with He. >>> >>> On Tue, Sep 16, 2014 at 8:43 PM, Jed Rothwell <jedrothw...@gmail.com> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> Peter Gluck <peter.gl...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> >>>> The second person could be Randy Mills himself- see what he has told on >>>>> my blog. >>>>> >>>> >>>> What second person? What do you mean? >>>> >>>> - Jed >>>> >>>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Dr. Peter Gluck >>> Cluj, Romania >>> http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com >>> >> >> > > > -- > Dr. Peter Gluck > Cluj, Romania > http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com >
