Thanks Axil, good citation and not surprising – I have been following this near 
field region since day one,  convinced that there is relativistic magic 
occurring as you approach the focal limits described by Liptschitz et all where 
the quantum forces from the solid geometry can initially focus. The author is 
calling for further research in light of data that doesn’t agree with our 
present models, instead the data suggests the force falls much faster with 
separation for this configuration[corrugated plane / sphere]. The geometry is 
not the standard  perpendicular plate arrangement. I assume he applied the 
appropriate Casimir formulas for this geometry but the data – by disagreeing 
with calculated value  indicates the better documented case for parallel plates 
is just coincidental [perhaps some missing parameter that cancels for the 
parallel case]. We knew that pv1=pv2 for a long time before the parameters were 
contained and we realized pv1/t1=pv2/t2 and the era of refrigeration was born. 
My gut still screams relativistic effects even though there is no dv/dt 
approaching C there is the intriguing possibility that the longer 
wavelength/larger virtual particles supposedly restricted from occurring 
between boundaries of smaller separation are actually still able to occupy the 
region by shrinking from our perspective such that any gas atoms present also 
seem to shrink [ie hydrino /fh]. My bet is that one day some math guy will 
prove a relationship between the Casimir formula and the dilation formula made 
famous in the Twin Paradox.  I firmly believe these f/h can actually slip 
between separations we perceive as  less than atomic orbital diameters because 
they are temporally displaced and still riding that focal distance between 
solid boundaries because they perceive a spatial separation due to 
dilation/contraction [ the fractional hydrogen is temporally displaced without 
the need for near C velocity]
Fran


From: Axil Axil [mailto:janap...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, September 23, 2014 11:59 AM
To: vortex-l
Subject: EXTERNAL: Re: [Vo]:Mizuno, Rossi & copper transmutation

Fran:

As is have posted many times, it is hard to tell what emerges from what. What 
comes first the chicken of the egg.

Did you know that the Casmir force and zero point energy can be completely 
controlled by polariton condensation.

New regime in the Casimir force observed

http://phys.org/news/2013-12-regime-casimir.html

and

Dymamical Casimir emission from polariton condensates

http://arxiv.org/abs/1303.1027

The Casmir effect can be eliminated or greatly amplified by polariton 
condensation. This new understanding in among the new hot topics in cavity 
physics.

On Tue, Sep 23, 2014 at 6:56 AM, Roarty, Francis X 
<francis.x.roa...@lmco.com<mailto:francis.x.roa...@lmco.com>> wrote:
In reply to  Jones Beene's message of Mon, 22 Sep 2014 16:32:02 -0700:  [snip] 
The usual "lame" rationalizations we have used is that the energy was
>borrowed in advance to overcome the Coulomb barrier or shed in advance to
>achieve the redundancy ...[/snip]

IMHO the  lock step motion of gas atoms in a loaded lattice provide the "bank" 
that loans energy to the reaction. I see this as ZPE underpinning where the 
geometry organizes random motion even extending down into the smaller NAE 
region where the very local defects in the lattice oppose the quantum forces of 
cavity  geometry all occurring unbeknownst to the gas atom who always sees his 
local environment full of virtual particles unchanged and simply responds to 
HUP to derive his normal random motion much like local and global geometry 
establishes local and regional weather patterns.

My point is that I agree it may not be fusion but disagree wrt there not being 
a source of energy to borrow.. the lock step motion of that many atoms 
represent a bank or a hammer and the closed cavity of the NAE is the loan 
seeking anvil.

Fran


Reply via email to