Thanks Axil, good citation and not surprising – I have been following this near field region since day one, convinced that there is relativistic magic occurring as you approach the focal limits described by Liptschitz et all where the quantum forces from the solid geometry can initially focus. The author is calling for further research in light of data that doesn’t agree with our present models, instead the data suggests the force falls much faster with separation for this configuration[corrugated plane / sphere]. The geometry is not the standard perpendicular plate arrangement. I assume he applied the appropriate Casimir formulas for this geometry but the data – by disagreeing with calculated value indicates the better documented case for parallel plates is just coincidental [perhaps some missing parameter that cancels for the parallel case]. We knew that pv1=pv2 for a long time before the parameters were contained and we realized pv1/t1=pv2/t2 and the era of refrigeration was born. My gut still screams relativistic effects even though there is no dv/dt approaching C there is the intriguing possibility that the longer wavelength/larger virtual particles supposedly restricted from occurring between boundaries of smaller separation are actually still able to occupy the region by shrinking from our perspective such that any gas atoms present also seem to shrink [ie hydrino /fh]. My bet is that one day some math guy will prove a relationship between the Casimir formula and the dilation formula made famous in the Twin Paradox. I firmly believe these f/h can actually slip between separations we perceive as less than atomic orbital diameters because they are temporally displaced and still riding that focal distance between solid boundaries because they perceive a spatial separation due to dilation/contraction [ the fractional hydrogen is temporally displaced without the need for near C velocity] Fran
From: Axil Axil [mailto:janap...@gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, September 23, 2014 11:59 AM To: vortex-l Subject: EXTERNAL: Re: [Vo]:Mizuno, Rossi & copper transmutation Fran: As is have posted many times, it is hard to tell what emerges from what. What comes first the chicken of the egg. Did you know that the Casmir force and zero point energy can be completely controlled by polariton condensation. New regime in the Casimir force observed http://phys.org/news/2013-12-regime-casimir.html and Dymamical Casimir emission from polariton condensates http://arxiv.org/abs/1303.1027 The Casmir effect can be eliminated or greatly amplified by polariton condensation. This new understanding in among the new hot topics in cavity physics. On Tue, Sep 23, 2014 at 6:56 AM, Roarty, Francis X <francis.x.roa...@lmco.com<mailto:francis.x.roa...@lmco.com>> wrote: In reply to Jones Beene's message of Mon, 22 Sep 2014 16:32:02 -0700: [snip] The usual "lame" rationalizations we have used is that the energy was >borrowed in advance to overcome the Coulomb barrier or shed in advance to >achieve the redundancy ...[/snip] IMHO the lock step motion of gas atoms in a loaded lattice provide the "bank" that loans energy to the reaction. I see this as ZPE underpinning where the geometry organizes random motion even extending down into the smaller NAE region where the very local defects in the lattice oppose the quantum forces of cavity geometry all occurring unbeknownst to the gas atom who always sees his local environment full of virtual particles unchanged and simply responds to HUP to derive his normal random motion much like local and global geometry establishes local and regional weather patterns. My point is that I agree it may not be fusion but disagree wrt there not being a source of energy to borrow.. the lock step motion of that many atoms represent a bank or a hammer and the closed cavity of the NAE is the loan seeking anvil. Fran
