It is said that Rossi uses a magnetic field to startup the E-Cat. Could
this be a large infusion of inductive heat supported by aluminum or lithium
aluminum?

On Sun, Oct 12, 2014 at 1:26 PM, Stefan Israelsson Tampe <
[email protected]> wrote:

> There is still the evidences that ther is a coil and that rossi has the
> powder in a varying magnetic field. He could use the wires both as
> resistive heating and
> controlling the reaction rate, maybe, maybe because you can stir it using
> localized magnetic fields stemming from this very strange nuclear process.
>
> On Sun, Oct 12, 2014 at 7:18 PM, Robert Lynn <
> [email protected]> wrote:
>
>> inductive heating works based on the area of the conductive loop cut by
>> the changing magnetic field, the rate of change of the magnetic field and
>> the conductivity of the material.  Consequently microscopic powder made
>> with high resistivity hot iron/nickel will have extremely weak response to
>> any low frequency inductive heating.  If inductive heating was the way
>> ahead a microwave source delivered through a waveguide or exterior cheap
>> off-the-shelf high-frequency inductive heater would be far more effective
>> (and easier to implement) than crude resistor wires.
>>
>> On 13 October 2014 01:08, Axil Axil <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>> There are also iron particles in the fuel mix that might support
>>> inductive heating local to the fuel mix. Inductive heating might result in
>>> the primary heater wire being colder than the fuel charge thus casting a
>>> darker shadow that we see in the pictures of the reactor in operation. I
>>> like the inductive heating idea.
>>>
>>> On Sun, Oct 12, 2014 at 1:02 PM, Axil Axil <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>>> The tubercles on the nickel powder function to ionize the hydrogen
>>>> using dipole motion induced by heat.
>>>>
>>>> On Sun, Oct 12, 2014 at 12:55 PM, Robert Lynn <
>>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> far above curie limit for Ni, magnetic fields won't move powder
>>>>> magnetically, only ions, but temps are too low for significant Li or H 
>>>>> ions
>>>>> to exist, and no ionising radiation sources in evidence.
>>>>>
>>>>> On 13 October 2014 00:49, Stefan Israelsson Tampe <
>>>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Yes but in that case the core can be hotter then the cables. We don't
>>>>>> know about the powder, and the changes of magnetic fields inside the core
>>>>>> could stir the powder around and by changing that behavior you might end 
>>>>>> up
>>>>>> controlling the reaction rate. Also inductive heating of an inner
>>>>>> containing cylinder does produce a fast response to the actual cylinder
>>>>>> which controls the heat radiative environment in there.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Sun, Oct 12, 2014 at 6:41 PM, Robert Lynn <
>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> inductive heating only works on conductive materials with sufficient
>>>>>>> thickness/area through which the changing magnetic flux passes to allow
>>>>>>> eddy currents to form.  With 150Hz pulses Nickel particles of tiny scale
>>>>>>> would not be affected (like thin motor laminates) - it would only work 
>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>> heat a secondary metal body that could then heat via radiation (very
>>>>>>> inefficient, and of no practical benefit).
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 13 October 2014 00:35, Stefan Israelsson Tampe <
>>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> How do we know that iti s resistive heating that is taking place?
>>>>>>>> Bob Greenyer at MFMP sugested that it is an inductive heater this means
>>>>>>>> that the wires
>>>>>>>> get a bit cooler then the heated core.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Sun, Oct 12, 2014 at 6:24 PM, Robert Lynn <
>>>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Fig 12b. page 26.   Only just notice that they say they are
>>>>>>>>> "inconel" resistance wires.  But how can the resistor wire, external 
>>>>>>>>> to the
>>>>>>>>> reactor, glow more brightly than the reactor itself (implying it is
>>>>>>>>> hotter)?  Also if the reactor external surface is at 1250-1410°C, 
>>>>>>>>> then on
>>>>>>>>> top of the 30-50°C temperature drop through the walls the resistive 
>>>>>>>>> wire
>>>>>>>>> would have to be even hotter (up towards 1500°C)  in order to be able 
>>>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>> radiate the 900W!  And there are no "inconel" metal wires that can 
>>>>>>>>> survive
>>>>>>>>> such temperatures in air for a month.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> http://www.engineeringtoolbox.com/melting-temperature-metals-d_860.html
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> There is also a mistake in their discussion for these figures, the
>>>>>>>>> metal resistors within the reactor would necessarily have to be 
>>>>>>>>> hotter than
>>>>>>>>> the reactor itself if they are to be able to output heat into the 
>>>>>>>>> reactor.
>>>>>>>>> But then again at >1450°C inconel resistance wires would have turned 
>>>>>>>>> into
>>>>>>>>> puddles anyway.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> The 2mm high fins on the outside, subjected to convective air
>>>>>>>>> cooling would be 30-50°C colder than the base of the fins due to the 
>>>>>>>>> longer
>>>>>>>>> conduction path and hence greater temperature drop through the 
>>>>>>>>> alumina.
>>>>>>>>> And that should influence the thermography to under-read, but also 
>>>>>>>>> means
>>>>>>>>> the temperature within the reactor would have to be even higher to 
>>>>>>>>> create
>>>>>>>>> 1400°C average surface temperature.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> So this proves that the thermographic temperature readings are off
>>>>>>>>> by a very long way - at least 150-200°C too high if inconel wires that
>>>>>>>>> max-out at about 1300-1350°C were to have survived for a month.  We 
>>>>>>>>> now
>>>>>>>>> know there is a huge error, we just don't know the source of the 
>>>>>>>>> error, or
>>>>>>>>> how big the error is.  But eg 1210°C vs 1410°C would drop power 
>>>>>>>>> output by
>>>>>>>>> 40% from that claimed so that the COP would be <2.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> With the existence of such a huge error of unknown source the
>>>>>>>>> claims of power output cannot not be trusted at all.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On the upside, it does however mean that the nickel was not
>>>>>>>>> melted, and lithium vapour pressure was a lot lower.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>

Reply via email to