"David Steele" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > When I was paying for internet access, to cut online time to a > minimum, I used to quickly skim through all the sites I needed to see. > This would hold them in the cache, then I'd log off and read them > properly. Ibrowse had a really good cache browser that suited that > sort of use. > Seems a bit pointless now but other people probably do it as well. No, not in the slightest. Plenty of us still pay for our online time. But using the old-style Voyager cachebrowser would hardly be a usable way to do this. That's exactly what the "offline browsing" option is for. Rob ____________________________________________________________ Voyager Mailing List - Info & Archive: http://www.vapor.com/ For Listserver Help: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "HELP" To Unsubscribe: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "UNSUBSCRIBE"
- [voyager] Re: What do you want in Voyager? Michael Badger
- [voyager] Re: What do you want in Voyager? Wayne Pyrah - H y p e r B o y -
- [voyager] Re: What do you want in Voyager? Gavin Kinsey
- [voyager] Re: What do you want in Voyager? G. R. Gooch
- [voyager] Re: What do you want in Voy... Rob Little
- [voyager] Re: What do you want in... Bob Quintal
- [voyager] Re: What do you wan... Rob Little
- [voyager] Re: What do you want in... G. R. Gooch
- [voyager] Re: What do you want in... David Steele
- [voyager] Re: What do you wan... Rob Little
- [voyager] Re: What do you wan... Norbert Roth
- [voyager] Re: What do you... Peter Stuart
- [voyager] Re: What d... Uffe Holst
- [voyager] Re: Wh... Peter Stuart
- [voyager] Re: Wh... Robyn & Steve
- [voyager] 3.1 Samy Merchi
- [voyager] Re: 3.... John Gillanders
- [voyager] Re: 3.... Ingo Musquinier
- [voyager] Re: 3.... Sean FT
- [voyager] Re: 3.... John Gillanders
