On Thu, Jan 26, 2017 at 4:38 PM, Jon Loeliger <j...@netgate.com> wrote:
>
>
> Does this same mechanism hold true for the VPE messages? Is the collection
> of the VPE message considered "a plugin", or "a base onto which plugins
> will
> be added"? There are currently 20 or 21 include files' worth of msg ids
> here.
>
> Specifically, I'm trying to resolve an understanding of what I was told to
> do
> last week (Use a msg_id based on a lookup of "<name>_<crc>") versus this
> use a msg_id obtained by "base + enum-value".
>
> Is there a plugin name for the VPE collection of API msg ids? (I don't
> think so.)
> Will these msg_ids always be 0-based so no base offset need be looked-up
> nor added?
>
> Thanks,
> jdl
>
Dave,
So, I feel like I may be a day late and a dollar short each time I ask
a question. Like above. So I just couldn't see where this base msg_id
addition was taking place... And about the time I was trying to figure
it out, this commit happened:
author Dave Barach <d...@barachs.net> 2017-01-25 16:32:08 -0500
commit 2d6b2d6d1bbb130921ec525a1cc6e88f42717c79 (patch)
Repair plugin binary API message numbering
Change-Id: I422a3f168bd483e011cfaf54af022cb79b78db02
Signed-off-by: Dave Barach <d...@barachs.net>
Which pretty much answers my question.
Are my questions the forcing function here? :-)
Or am I just on the bleeding edge?
jdl
_______________________________________________
vpp-dev mailing list
vpp-dev@lists.fd.io
https://lists.fd.io/mailman/listinfo/vpp-dev
