Hey VPP Builders, Do you ever use "cd build-root; make distclean"? Does it look sort of like this:
jdl $ cd build-root/ jdl $ make distclean rm -rf /home/jdl/workspace/vpp/build-root/build-*/ rm -rf /home/jdl/workspace/vpp/build-root/build-tool-* rm -rf /home/jdl/workspace/vpp/build-root/install-* rm -rf /home/jdl/workspace/vpp/build-root/images-* rm -rf /home/jdl/workspace/vpp/build-root/tools rm -rf /home/jdl/workspace/vpp/build-root/*.deb rm -rf /home/jdl/workspace/vpp/build-root/*.rpm rm -rf /home/jdl/workspace/vpp/build-root/*.changes rm -rf /home/jdl/workspace/vpp/build-root/python if [ -e /usr/bin/dh ];then (cd /home/jdl/workspace/vpp/build-root/deb/;debian/rules clean); fi rm -f /home/jdl/workspace/vpp/build-root/deb/debian/*.install rm -f /home/jdl/workspace/vpp/build-root/deb/debian/changelog Remember back in commit c06eeb0e3c9c1a9fa8f913e2d785b03220bfdabd Author: Damjan Marion <damar...@cisco.com> Date: Tue Apr 18 15:26:39 2017 +0200 Fix "make dist" to include version number, docouple it from rpm packaging Change-Id: If2f9976d668089026c97b897cf449bff09050631 Signed-off-by: Damjan Marion <damar...@cisco.com> when we moved the RPM building pieces out of build-root/rpm and placed them under extras/rpm instead? Should we have also modified the distclean make target to rm the rpms out of extras/rpm too? Or was that an intentional change as well? Thanks, jdl
_______________________________________________ vpp-dev mailing list vpp-dev@lists.fd.io https://lists.fd.io/mailman/listinfo/vpp-dev