Hi Florin, Over the weekend, I went through the document that you mentioned and it gave me a good overview. Thanks for pointing to that doc. However, my task of integrating mqs->epfd into our main dispatch loop still seems to be needing more finer details of the code.
With this respect, I have following few queries. It would be great if you can help with this. If this path poses more effort/risk in integration, we may want to switch to host interface approach ( which has its own issues though :( ) 1) Terminology mapping. In the VCL application framework, is the following mapping a correct understanding (with some open items) ? TCP-Application => app with a specific client index Worker => thread in the tcp-application Session => tcp end point mq in worker => mapped to ? mq_evt_conn => mapped to ? 2) Howcome vppcom_epoll_create is creating a new session. Bit confusing here. 3) Is the TCP server listen_fd also can be integrated into our application dispatch loop ? 4) How to get hold of mqs->epfd to put into our dispatcher? I see that the vcl_worker_t is inside vcl_private.c and .h which are not accessible by the application directly. Also, i dont see a direct need of having vcl_test_worker* framework in our app. Hope this is fine. 5) why can't the TCP application directly use vcl_worker_t data structure ? 6) Is there a sample tcp server example that has the server implementation with linux epoll instead of vppcom_epoll system. 7) Do you think this approach of integration will be more complex and hence do you suggest us moving to LDP (or) host interface approach ? Please let us know. Thanks in advance for your time. -- Thanks & Regards, Murthy
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#15788): https://lists.fd.io/g/vpp-dev/message/15788 Mute This Topic: https://lists.fd.io/mt/71899986/21656 Group Owner: vpp-dev+ow...@lists.fd.io Unsubscribe: https://lists.fd.io/g/vpp-dev/unsub [arch...@mail-archive.com] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
