Vratko, > > Why do you say that vpp_papi need to be dual licensed? > > I think e-mail reply would be long, > and I will need to address comments anyway, > so I respond via a Gerrit change [1].
I didn't understand the argument made in that patch. Two points for originality regarding choice of tool for discussion. I prefer to keep it in email. The VPP Python binding (VPP PAPI) is independent of the test framework. The test framework is one of multiple uses of the Python binding. If you argument is that PAPI should accommodate its license because of one of the uses of it... that seems backwards. Best regards, Ole
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#18634): https://lists.fd.io/g/vpp-dev/message/18634 Mute This Topic: https://lists.fd.io/mt/80281371/21656 Group Owner: vpp-dev+ow...@lists.fd.io Unsubscribe: https://lists.fd.io/g/vpp-dev/unsub [arch...@mail-archive.com] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
