Am Samstag, 3. März 2007 schrieb Per Inge Mathisen: > I agree with Watermelon. I think there is a good reason why I can't > think of any other project that tries to do this. AFAICT, gnome uses > gdb to produce core dump reports. > > Stripping debug symbols is bad. IIRC, in most Linux distros, every > binary is shipped with debug symbols so that (power) users can produce > useful bug reports with gdb. > > On Windows, of course, things are rather different. I remember the > Windows error dump code in Freeciv used to produce some useful error > reports (but I think it is only used in the win32 client that hardly > anybody use anymore). Well, I didn't say that the Minidump should be removed. It allready was helpful in at least one case.
So what do you think should be done? Leave it as is (was before my commits) and don't try to automate the backtrace creation? Or offer a way to assist unexperienced users to create a backtrace? If yes, how? --Dennis
pgps1qB3GLY0e.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Warzone-dev mailing list Warzone-dev@gna.org https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/warzone-dev
