Giel van Schijndel wrote: > Paul Wise schreef: >> On Wed, 2008-07-23 at 01:15 +0200, Giel van Schijndel wrote: >>> Any thoughts on this? >> Another beta might be a good idea, if it is done quickly. >> >> Also, when the final release is done, we can put a warzone2100 backport >> on backports.org for lenny users to upgrade to. Many people don't know >> about backports.org though, so that might become a support issue/FAQ for >> the warzone devs. > > To all devs (with or without commit access): I would really like this to > be an "active" decision on our part, as opposed to a "passive" one, > where we allow the decision to be made for us due to time passing. I.e. > either we decide that we do want our current state of 2.1 to be included > in Debian's next stable release, or we decide that we don't want that to > happen. As long as that decision is an active one, I can live with both. > > The only negative impact of this on us I can see is the support/FAQ > issue mentioned above by Paul. >
I think another quick beta would be a good route if 2.1 is currently stable enough and runs well on Debian, otherwise there really isn't a good reason to include it in a stable release (and, yes, I know I'm stating the obvious ;) If there are still some rough edges in Debian 2.1, sticking 2.0.10 in lenny and relegating 2.1 to backports.org might be the better course of action. Tim _______________________________________________ Warzone-dev mailing list Warzone-dev@gna.org https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/warzone-dev
