Am Donnerstag, 24. Juli 2008 13:47:17 schrieb Christian Ohm: > On Thursday, 24 July 2008 at 2:00, Giel van Schijndel wrote: > > either we decide that we do want our current state of 2.1 to be included > ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ > > I think that is the problem. If 2.1 is included in stable now, it will > stay at the version included at freeze time, whatever that will be (if I > remember the policy correctly). There is debian-volatile for > fast-changing packages, though the descriptions only talks about things > like virus scanners or spam filters, I don't know if games are accepted > there, and I don't know how many people know about it (possibly even > less than backports). > > So is whatever will be available at freeze time suitable to be included > in a stable distribution for over a year? I assumed just the 2.1 part would be fixed, but 2.1.x bugfix releases would still go into future releases of Lenny and onto the update-servers?
> > in Debian's next stable release, or we decide that we don't want that to > > happen. As long as that decision is an active one, I can live with both. > > Well, if it can be updated (which I doubt, but I could be wrong), then > I'm ok with including it, but if it cannot, then backports sounds like > the better plan to me. Agreed. --DevUrandom
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ Warzone-dev mailing list Warzone-dev@gna.org https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/warzone-dev
