>> Blockers: >> What version number should this be? The code is making reference to >> waveinabox 0.3. (Was 0.1, 0.2 ever released?). If we use 0.4 as our >> first Apache Release does this seem sensible? (To avoid the problems >> of ending up with repeated numbers in a few releases time). >> > > Does it make sense to use semantic versioning, e.g. start with v1.0.0 and > then increase numbers apropriately? (following http://semver.org/ guideline) > I wouldn't be afraid to call this v1.0, it may even be beneficial if that > atracts people to the project, which is precisely what we need the most IMO.
A 1.0 is normally assumed to be quite stable. (In my experience, Wave is still not there yet), hence I think 0.4 (being > 0.3 to prevent confusion), but <1.0 is a reasonable starting point for the Apache releases. Unless I hear a preference from _the other committers/PMC_ within the next 24h, I will go ahead and branch, make changelogs, release-notes and tag. @Michael: Once tagged tomorrow, am I definitely leaving it to you to compile+sign+post vote emails? I think it would be best to keep this fast pace going and have the vote mails sent by (at latest) next Wednesday. (Given we seem to have lots of discussion of where to go after this release). Is that ok with you? Ali
