I agree that a anything below 1.0 sends the right message AFAIK. Novice question (similar to Dave's - but didn't saw an answer): does Apache Wave versioning uses the http://semver.org/ "standard"? Or will use?
Thanks. http://alfredo.abambres.com *"Moving, always moving, and living inside movement". Rainer Maria Rilke* On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 9:05 PM, Yuri Z <vega...@gmail.com> wrote: > 0.4 is fine with me > > > On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 11:03 PM, Upayavira <u...@odoko.co.uk> wrote: > > > I agree that 1.0 would give the wrong message. Some <1.0 version is > > right. > > > > Upayavira > > > > On Thu, May 30, 2013, at 08:49 PM, Ali Lown wrote: > > > >> Blockers: > > > >> What version number should this be? The code is making reference to > > > >> waveinabox 0.3. (Was 0.1, 0.2 ever released?). If we use 0.4 as our > > > >> first Apache Release does this seem sensible? (To avoid the problems > > > >> of ending up with repeated numbers in a few releases time). > > > >> > > > > > > > > Does it make sense to use semantic versioning, e.g. start with v1.0.0 > > and > > > > then increase numbers apropriately? (following > http://semver.org/guideline) > > > > I wouldn't be afraid to call this v1.0, it may even be beneficial if > > that > > > > atracts people to the project, which is precisely what we need the > > most IMO. > > > > > > A 1.0 is normally assumed to be quite stable. (In my experience, Wave > > > is still not there yet), hence I think 0.4 (being > 0.3 to prevent > > > confusion), but <1.0 is a reasonable starting point for the Apache > > > releases. > > > > > > Unless I hear a preference from _the other committers/PMC_ within the > > > next 24h, I will go ahead and branch, make changelogs, release-notes > > > and tag. > > > > > > @Michael: Once tagged tomorrow, am I definitely leaving it to you to > > > compile+sign+post vote emails? I think it would be best to keep this > > > fast pace going and have the vote mails sent by (at latest) next > > > Wednesday. (Given we seem to have lots of discussion of where to go > > > after this release). Is that ok with you? > > > > > > Ali > > >
