I agree that 1.0 would give the wrong message. Some <1.0 version is right.
Upayavira On Thu, May 30, 2013, at 08:49 PM, Ali Lown wrote: > >> Blockers: > >> What version number should this be? The code is making reference to > >> waveinabox 0.3. (Was 0.1, 0.2 ever released?). If we use 0.4 as our > >> first Apache Release does this seem sensible? (To avoid the problems > >> of ending up with repeated numbers in a few releases time). > >> > > > > Does it make sense to use semantic versioning, e.g. start with v1.0.0 and > > then increase numbers apropriately? (following http://semver.org/ guideline) > > I wouldn't be afraid to call this v1.0, it may even be beneficial if that > > atracts people to the project, which is precisely what we need the most IMO. > > A 1.0 is normally assumed to be quite stable. (In my experience, Wave > is still not there yet), hence I think 0.4 (being > 0.3 to prevent > confusion), but <1.0 is a reasonable starting point for the Apache > releases. > > Unless I hear a preference from _the other committers/PMC_ within the > next 24h, I will go ahead and branch, make changelogs, release-notes > and tag. > > @Michael: Once tagged tomorrow, am I definitely leaving it to you to > compile+sign+post vote emails? I think it would be best to keep this > fast pace going and have the vote mails sent by (at latest) next > Wednesday. (Given we seem to have lots of discussion of where to go > after this release). Is that ok with you? > > Ali
