Another benefit of maven is that it can automate some of the release
processes in terms of generating the tar-ball and tagging SVN.

On 5/31/13 3:17 PM, "Angus Turner" <[email protected]> wrote:

>Hi Paulo,
>I want to thank you for all your hard work on getting this done. Once
>you've gotten all the changes synced up, it'd be good to get a diff on
>reviewboard so comments can be made. Obviously this is too late for our
>first release, but it'd be great to get it ready for next release.
>
>Anything that makes the codebase easier to understand and follow is a big
>+1 from me
>
>Thanks
>Angus Turner
>[email protected]
>
>
>On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 8:50 PM, Paulo Pires <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> Page where Maven module structure is discussed can be found at
>> https://github.com/pires/wave/wiki/WiaB-Maven-Module-Organization
>>
>> On May 31, 2013, at 9:18 AM, Paulo Pires <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> > Hi all,
>> >
>> > Right now, I have this https://github.com/pires/wave
>> >
>> > I'll be merging latest changes during the day, but this is enough for
>> you to fiddle with.
>> >
>> > Also, I had only one issue with JDK7, that I eventually fixed in
>> 
>>https://github.com/pires/wave/commit/34e44e1dfb0ac6e7820f4d4b71fe05837efe
>>d960
>> >
>> > Cheers,
>> > PP
>> >
>> > On May 30, 2013, at 7:12 PM, Dave <[email protected]> wrote:
>> >
>> >> On 30/05/13 18:45, Michael MacFadden wrote:
>> >>> If we have some interests, I would be more than happy to re-engage
>> with PP
>> >>> and get that maven transition done.  While it's not a huge step I
>> think it
>> >>> will entice developers.
>> >>
>> >> My experience has been that Maven can be a bit of a Marmite
>>transition
>> - some people love it, some people hate it. Personally, I'm quite fond
>>of
>> Maven, but I've certainly never been put off using or contributing to a
>> project because it uses ant.
>> >>
>> >> However clearer structure & modularising the codebase is something
>>that
>> I'm sure everyone would support, whatever build framework we use. With
>>our
>> limited resources, would it be wise to focus on these initially?
>> >>
>> >> I don't really have a say in the matter, but while I'd be quite happy
>> to see a transition to Maven, I'm not sure it's a particularly pressing
>> issue for the project at the moment.  Sort of organising the deckchairs
>>on
>> the titanic? ;-)
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> Dave
>> >
>>
>>


Reply via email to