Thanks, Paulo! I ll take a look.
On Sun, Jun 2, 2013 at 2:49 PM, Paulo Pires <[email protected]> wrote: > The merge is done. Would be great if people could take a look and > double-check it at https://github.com/pires/wave. > > Michael, thanks for your support. Perhaps a good start would be to > continue the package/module renaming and revisit the open issues. > > Cheers, > PP > > Em 2013-06-01 23:32, Michael MacFadden escreveu: > > Another benefit of maven is that it can automate some of the release >> processes in terms of generating the tar-ball and tagging SVN. >> >> On 5/31/13 3:17 PM, "Angus Turner" <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> Hi Paulo, >>> I want to thank you for all your hard work on getting this done. Once >>> you've gotten all the changes synced up, it'd be good to get a diff on >>> reviewboard so comments can be made. Obviously this is too late for our >>> first release, but it'd be great to get it ready for next release. >>> >>> Anything that makes the codebase easier to understand and follow is a big >>> +1 from me >>> >>> Thanks >>> Angus Turner >>> [email protected] >>> >>> >>> On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 8:50 PM, Paulo Pires <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>> >>> Page where Maven module structure is discussed can be found at >>>> https://github.com/pires/wave/**wiki/WiaB-Maven-Module-**Organization<https://github.com/pires/wave/wiki/WiaB-Maven-Module-Organization> >>>> >>>> On May 31, 2013, at 9:18 AM, Paulo Pires <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>> > Hi all, >>>> > >>>> > Right now, I have this https://github.com/pires/wave >>>> > >>>> > I'll be merging latest changes during the day, but this is enough for >>>> you to fiddle with. >>>> > >>>> > Also, I had only one issue with JDK7, that I eventually fixed in >>>> >>>> https://github.com/pires/wave/**commit/**34e44e1dfb0ac6e7820f4d4b71fe05 >>>> **837efe<https://github.com/pires/wave/commit/34e44e1dfb0ac6e7820f4d4b71fe05837efe> >>>> d960 >>>> > >>>> > Cheers, >>>> > PP >>>> > >>>> > On May 30, 2013, at 7:12 PM, Dave <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> > >>>> >> On 30/05/13 18:45, Michael MacFadden wrote: >>>> >>> If we have some interests, I would be more than happy to re-engage >>>> with PP >>>> >>> and get that maven transition done. While it's not a huge step I >>>> think it >>>> >>> will entice developers. >>>> >> >>>> >> My experience has been that Maven can be a bit of a Marmite >>>> transition >>>> - some people love it, some people hate it. Personally, I'm quite fond >>>> of >>>> Maven, but I've certainly never been put off using or contributing to a >>>> project because it uses ant. >>>> >> >>>> >> However clearer structure & modularising the codebase is something >>>> that >>>> I'm sure everyone would support, whatever build framework we use. With >>>> our >>>> limited resources, would it be wise to focus on these initially? >>>> >> >>>> >> I don't really have a say in the matter, but while I'd be quite happy >>>> to see a transition to Maven, I'm not sure it's a particularly pressing >>>> issue for the project at the moment. Sort of organising the deckchairs >>>> on >>>> the titanic? ;-) >>>> >> >>>> >> >>>> >> Dave >>>> > >>>> >>>> >>>> > -- > Paulo Pires > Ubiwhere >
