On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 11:30 AM, jochen <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > On Nov 20, 12:08 pm, Michael K <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi. > > > > As I've mentioned in the "Time for a Client/Server protocol" > > discussion ( > https://groups.google.com/group/wave-protocol/browse_thread/thread/18... > > ) a while back, I am planning to take the existing FedOne console > > client code, and separate its communications layer into a java > > library. This way people (including myself) can start making their own > > clients for FedOne, at least in java, and not have to wait for a > > complete C/S protocol to be developed (which I think is still a long > > way off). > > > > I just finished setting up my development environment today, and I > > will be familiarizing myself with the FedOne code over the next week > > or two. I will post updates in this group when there is something > > worthy of mentioning. > > > > Anyway, I would certainly be very interested to know who else is > > working on which parts that are still missing from FedOne, and to > > coordinate my work with other contributors. > > > > There are still a lot of things missing from FedOne. We should make a > > detailed list on that page you've started. A client/server API (or > > preferably a proper C/S protocol) and persistance are the two most > > critical parts. ACL and client-side OT also come to mind. What else? > > Hi Mikael, > > You correctly point out that persistence, ACL and client-side OT are > critical for a non-prototype system. Another missing critical feature > is reliable delivery of updates (see an earlier post of mine: > > https://groups.google.com/group/wave-protocol/browse_thread/thread/96e7c637c2332881/786f64cdf3d67953?hl=en&lnk=gst&[email protected]#786f64cdf3d67953 > ) > - we are working on a better requirements spec for this. > > regards, > Jochen > > Jochen,
Correct me if i'm wrong, but at least for reliable delivery of deltas between a server and directly connected clients, the current code in fed one should be sufficient, yes? Or are there corner cases I haven't thought about yet? All the issues raised in your earlier email seem to be about reliable delivery of messages between federating servers, unless I'm mistaken... brett -- Brett Morgan http://domesticmouse.livejournal.com/ --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Wave Protocol" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/wave-protocol?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
