On Wed, Dec 21, 2016 at 5:49 PM, Carsten Haitzler <ras...@rasterman.com> wrote: > On Wed, 21 Dec 2016 12:24:33 -0700 Chris Murphy <li...@colorremedies.com> > said: > >> So... >> >> Do applications (wayland clients) choose what compositor to use? Each >> application could be using a different compositor? >> >> Does it make any sense that there'd be three different classes of >> compositor: no-color management, assume sRGB color management, and >> full color management (all objects are explicitly tagged and the >> compositor is doing display compensation with the help of e.g. lcms)? >> Or am I missing something about compositors? > > your choice of wm or desktop chooses your compositor. choose gnome? it'll be > mutter. choose enlightenment? it'll be enlightenment. choose kde? it'll be > kwin > etc. etc. etc.
Aha OK. And how does Weston fit into it? Do any of them directly leverage Weston or is it just a reference to get Wayland support included? -- Chris Murphy _______________________________________________ wayland-devel mailing list wayland-devel@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/wayland-devel
