At 02:54 PM 9/16/2010 -0400, Chris McDonough wrote:
On Thu, 2010-09-16 at 14:04 -0400, P.J. Eby wrote:
> At 10:35 AM 9/16/2010 -0700, Guido van Rossum wrote:
> >No comments on the rest except to note that at this point it looks
> >unlikely that we can make everyone happy (or even get an agreement to
> >adopt what would be the long-term technically optimal solution --
> >AFAICT there is no agreement on what that solution would be, if one
> >weren't to take porting Python 2 code into account). IOW
> >something/sokebody has gotta give.
>
> Indeed. This entire discussion has pushed me strongly in favor of
> doing a super-minimalist update to PEP 333 with the following points:
Right on, write it all down! ;-)
I thought I just did. ;-)
Okay, I will carve out some cycles.
(Btw, it appears that somebody has recently hacked on the code in PEP
333 and inadvertently broken the specification, so I'll be fixing that first.)
_______________________________________________
Web-SIG mailing list
Web-SIG@python.org
Web SIG: http://www.python.org/sigs/web-sig
Unsubscribe:
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/web-sig/archive%40mail-archive.com
