no news there. we know that web2py is more packed of features by default. On Wednesday, October 3, 2012 10:51:30 PM UTC+2, LightDot wrote: > > I just noticed that Andriy has updated the article with an "Isolated > Benchmark" yesterday. I quote: "In order to provide more reliable benchmark > I get rid of application server and network boundary. As a result I > simulated a valid WSGI request and isolated calls just to framework alone" > > The article is still at the same address: > http://mindref.blogspot.com/2012/09/python-fastest-web-framework.html > > And the source code for the new test is here: > https://bitbucket.org/akorn/helloworld/src/tip/benchmark.py > > Regards, > Ales > > On Tuesday, September 25, 2012 2:01:55 PM UTC+2, Jose C wrote: >> >> Just stumbled across this benchmark: >> >> http://mindref.blogspot.pt/2012/09/python-fastest-web-framework.html >> >> on the python group discussion: >> >> https://groups.google.com/forum/?fromgroups=#!topic/comp.lang.python/yu1_BQZsPPc >> >> The author also notes a memory leak problem with web2py but no specifics >> that I could see. >> >> Thoughts? >> >>
--
