OK. I will look into this. Massimo
On Friday, 28 December 2012 18:35:10 UTC-6, Cliff Kachinske wrote: > > I agree this is the right way to do it. > > On Friday, December 28, 2012 2:03:13 AM UTC-5, Massimo Di Pierro wrote: >> >> If we allow setting is_active from False to True we would be able to >> re-cycle the record and there would be a record of the recycling (who >> deleted it, who restored it, and when). >> >> If we clone a deleted record we break references to it and it would be >> hard to track the consequences of the restoration. >> >> Massimo >> >> On Friday, 28 December 2012 00:19:54 UTC-6, Mandar Vaze wrote: >>> >>> >>> >>>> You should be able to clone a deleted record however. >>> >>> >>> I agree. An ability to "clone" the deleted record would be great. I >>> assume no such feature exists (correct ? I didn't find any) >>> >>> If you are just using your auditing log like a recycle bin, then please >>>> name it as such. >>>> >>> >>> Minor nitpick - Current behavior isn't EXACTLY like a recycle >>> bin. Recycle Bin indicates an object has gone FROM one location to recycle >>> bin. But in this case, the older copy of record is copied to archive table >>> and record itself is MODIFIED (is_active=False) >>> >>> In any case, you can count this as a vote for not allowing undeletes by >>>> changing the is_active flag. >>>> >>> >>> I'm OK with this as well. >>> >>> -Mandar >>> >> --
