Maybe just a check sum on file that should be update after an upgrade could allow to display a message in admin and maybe if the files to be updated have the sum of one of the precedent file mean that the user has didn't change anything those file could be overwritten whitout issue... I would prefer updating them manually even if they had not be modify and only be inform that they should be update...
Richard On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 2:42 AM, Jason (spot) Brower <encomp...@gmail.com>wrote: > We could also minify it so people would be nuts to try to change it. :) > > > > On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 9:42 AM, Jason (spot) Brower > <encomp...@gmail.com>wrote: > >> I wonder if we should have a comment in the file that they shouldn't >> change this file as it will be overwritten. >> >> >> >> On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 9:38 AM, Massimo Di Pierro < >> massimo.dipie...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> The problem is that an old app can be installed after an upgrade and it >>> would not work because it would still come with the old web2py.js. I do not >>> think web2py.js can be update automatically nor it should. >>> >>> >>> >>> On Wednesday, 26 June 2013 14:35:05 UTC-5, LightDot wrote: >>>> >>>> +1 for considering web2py.js as a part of web2py framework, so users >>>> should be requested to update it along with the framework. >>>> >>>> How about extending this definition and requirement to appadmin..? >>>> >>>> Also - what happens with old apps that have ancient jquery.js? Will new >>>> web2py.js cause a chain of upgrades for such users, ie. requires new >>>> jquery.js -> requires new 3rd party js libs -> requires code adjustments in >>>> the application? >>>> >>>> I guess now would be a good time to try out old vanilla welcome apps >>>> with new web2py/web2py.js... I really hate suggesting such things rather >>>> than doing them, but I'm up to ears in a project that's on the deadline so >>>> I have very little free time right now :/ >>>> >>>> Regards, >>>> Ales >>>> >>>> On Wednesday, June 26, 2013 7:00:46 PM UTC+2, viniciusban wrote: >>>>> >>>>> +1 >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Wed, Jun 26, 2013 at 1:46 PM, Anthony <abas...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>> > On Wednesday, June 26, 2013 11:33:59 AM UTC-4, Massimo Di Pierro >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >> >>>>> >> Are you suggested web2py.js should be served by a spacial action >>>>> and not >>>>> >> being part of the applications? >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > Interesting idea. >>>>> > >>>>> > -- >>>>> > >>>>> > --- >>>>> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >>>>> Groups >>>>> > "web2py-users" group. >>>>> > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, >>>>> send an >>>>> > email to web2py+un...@googlegroups.com. >>>>> > For more options, visit >>>>> > https://groups.google.com/**groups/opt_out<https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out>. >>>>> >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> >>>> -- >>> >>> --- >>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >>> Groups "web2py-users" group. >>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send >>> an email to web2py+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. >>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. >>> >>> >>> >> >> > -- > > --- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "web2py-users" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to web2py+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. > > > -- --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "web2py-users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to web2py+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
