I share your frustration Niphlod and I am with you on this. I see all these posts about os, boy with a new toy but barely about how we do certain things given what's already there.
On Thursday, May 26, 2016 at 3:18:12 PM UTC-4, Niphlod wrote: > > I don't want to push anyone away but if the underlying statement is "I > need this ready to go" and a library-framework-whatever doesn't contain it, > then there's really nothing anyone can do. Nobody ever said that web2py is > a silver bullet (nor is it django, flask, express, sails, rails, cakephp, > caddy, iris, play, limonade, onion, sinatra, put_your_own_here). If you > feel you project can come to life easier with another framework and you > don't want to contribute to web2py, hinting a blackmail is not going to win > you any added feature :P > > On Thursday, May 26, 2016 at 5:55:16 PM UTC+2, Pierre wrote: >> >> I thought GIS/Geolocation is something fancy / highly desirable ? It >> also implies some important aspects of life .......... >> the GIS function i miss is *st_transform* (POSTGIS) which i can test in >> depth if implemented. It won't be a drama if it's not as there are >> workarounds via *pyproj* or *gdal* used by Geodjango. In the worst case >> I cannot put all this together, you can imagine what a "reasonable person" >> would be tempted to do........ >> > -- Resources: - http://web2py.com - http://web2py.com/book (Documentation) - http://github.com/web2py/web2py (Source code) - https://code.google.com/p/web2py/issues/list (Report Issues) --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "web2py-users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to web2py+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
