Hmmmm.... The process of a sprint will show more clearly what kinds of things need to be addressed in documentation.
I don't agree - I don't think this will be a diversion; I think it will be enlightening (and possibly show up things people from various aspects didn't expect). On Sat, Jul 11, 2009 at 11:34 AM, Joe Barnhart <joe.barnh...@gmail.com>wrote: > > I think its a complete diversion of effort and a waste of time. > > The reason we don't have meaningful apps on web2py is because nobody > can figure out how to use it. The documentation SUCKS. Hello??!? > Haven't we had this discussion endless times already? > > We are the same group who couldn't create our own WIKI in web2py so we > could have a PLACE for documentation. Instead of fixing the wiki > we're going to hike the banners and storm the walls of other platforms > by doing our own CMS? > > We need cohesive documentation so we can grow the pool of web2py > users. Useful meaningful applications will come if we have a user > community with depth. Which we DON'T at present. > > -- Joe Barnhart > > On Jul 10, 1:32 pm, mdipierro <mdipie...@cs.depaul.edu> wrote: > > I think we need to build two task forces. > > > > 1) to build a CMS > > > > 2) to build a eStore > > > > the more overlap the better. We need two project leaders and > > volunteers. I also suggest starting by creating google docs to gather > > requirements. > > > > Lots of people needs these, including me. > > > > Massimo > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "web2py Web Framework" group. To post to this group, send email to web2py@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to web2py+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/web2py?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
