Do we really need more options? I do not think so. The problem is that we have some great options and no process in place for deciding which ones we like best. I like A and C.
Moreover I'd rather have the logo developed by a member of this community since we will need adaptations. Massimo On Oct 12, 2:21 pm, rochacbruno <rochacbr...@gmail.com> wrote: > I will make a try with some logo ideas posted here, and sent to me by mail. > > I think worth a try with more creative professionals. People are saying > web2py deserves a professional logo. > > So we can try a $200 award logo inhttp://www.crowdspring.com/ > > We have to pay only if chose to use. > > Almost 110 designers will send a logo idea, we just have to say the > guidelines for the new logo. > > 1. Only letters > 2. Blend with the color scheme of the new site > 3. Being lower case (i like UPPER, because it differs from web.py, and is > closer to helpers style i.e DIV, DAL, FORM, SQLFORM, WEB2PY), but most people > here prefers in lower. > 4.do not depends on background > 5..... > > But, if we chose a logo made byhttp://www.crowdspring.com/we gonna have to > pay at least $200 > > Enviado via iPhone > > Em 12/10/2010, às 13:41, Thadeus Burgess <thade...@thadeusb.com> escreveu: > > > That is why I like logo B. It puts emphasis on the 2. Logo B with the new > > color scheme. Though I do like the orange in small quantities! > > > -- > > Thadeus > > > On Tue, Oct 12, 2010 at 11:26 AM, mdipierro <mdipie...@cs.depaul.edu> wrote: > > The problem is we already have lots of unintentional brand confusion > > with web.py > > > On Oct 12, 10:50 am, weheh <richard_gor...@verizon.net> wrote: > > > I'm pleased with this latest doodle. Font, color, background, drop > > > shadow can be changed easily. Can be shrunk and embossed into a > > > "powered by" lozenge sticker. > > > >https://docs.google.com/leaf?id=0BzPqKovYWlw-ODY2Nzk0OWMtODU5Zi00YmI1... > >
