On Oct 27, 2011, at 10:57 AM, Massimo Di Pierro wrote: > Any suggestion for improvement?
I'm not sure when I'll have time to get around to it, but my idea is to implement both Storage.__getattr__ and .__getitem__ in terms of super(get(whatever, None)). (That's not quite the syntax, but you get the idea.) I don't suppose that __setattr__ needs any special attention. > > On Oct 25, 3:32 pm, Jonathan Lundell <jlund...@pobox.com> wrote: >> On Oct 25, 2011, at 1:18 PM, Anthony <abasta...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> On Tuesday, October 25, 2011 4:08:20 PM UTC-4, pepper_bg wrote: >>>> You can do >>>> s.get(6,None) >> >>> Still have to anticipate what my keys are and write different code >>> accordingly. Which is fine in most cases I guess. Or may be I am >>> trying to be too generic here. Thanks for your input... >> >>> If you're not sure whether a key might be a string or integer, you can use >>> the s.get() method in all cases. >> >> Still, it'd make sense for s['a'] to have the same semantics as s.a.
