+1
On Feb 5, 3:20 pm, Simon Lukell <sluk...@gmail.com> wrote: > As a 'bystander', I personally think that Niphlod's response is of > such good quality that the gist of it deserves inclusion in the book.
+1
On Feb 5, 3:20 pm, Simon Lukell <sluk...@gmail.com> wrote: > As a 'bystander', I personally think that Niphlod's response is of > such good quality that the gist of it deserves inclusion in the book.