Maybe have a look at http://web2py.com/books/default/chapter/29/04#Cooperation and http://web2py.com/books/default/chapter/29/09#Central-Authentication-Service .
Anthony On Saturday, September 8, 2012 5:19:03 PM UTC-4, luckysmack wrote: > > Ok will do. But im still curious though if web2py as a whole would fit my > idea? In web2py I you have applications, one for each app.If I had this > core as one app, and the others build on it (they wouldnt just use the api, > the api would be part of the app). So it seems like I would need to > duplicate that part into each app the way web2py seems to be built. I could > be wrong on this, as an example, this rest api code would be its own git > repo, and the others would be separate ones. I dont see how I would > separate them in a web2py app. > > On Saturday, September 8, 2012 12:39:26 AM UTC-7, luckysmack wrote: >> >> I am somewhat new to python, and * shock * have an idea for a simple app >> I want to build. To start the app will be relatively light weight, but if >> it works out in my grand scheme could be far more complex.but the core will >> be fairly simple. something an experienced python dev could probably whip >> up in bottle in a few days. >> >> The core will a simply be an advanced rest based api. The other half >> dozen or so apps will all be built of this core. The either apps will >> likely be built as a cms like system to manage each other. And as different >> as a POS in store program. >> >> So as many cool things as I thing web2py has, do you guys think its the >> right system? I know w2p can do great APIs easily. But for that simple >> aspect, I don't need a milti-application admin interface, or a code editor, >> and I may not even use DAL. (For my project I may actually use something >> like neo4j/orientdb/titan. Not sure yet. Might use mongodb as instead). So >> for that simple part, all the other stuff seems a little bloated to me. >> Stuff that I won't need. >> >> Sure as a whole, all the apps will be built into somewhat of a cms (which >> I would like to build anyways), for that I'm not sure I would need the >> web2py admin part. As a cms I would probably have my own interface, even >> for the admins. How or would web2py admin ui fit in. I know you guys are >> biased towards web2py, but does it sound like it would be a right fit? Or >> would it be too complex? In comparison, I feel django is too bloated as >> well since I would be doing a similar thing, except it would be done quite >> a bit differently. The core of how it works doesn't seem to fit my ideas. >> >> If I don't use web2py, the next best things I see as a starting point are >> pyramid, or bottle/flask or even wheezy looks pretty cool. >> >> What do you guys think? The core great api would be the crux of the other >> apps. This core is what talks to the db. And each if the apps with build on >> it. The rest part will be made so they can all communicate with each other >> based on the URL. >> >> The either individual apps, were they to be on their own, I can totally >> see as a web2py app. So I'm curious how this idea as a whole, would fit >> into web2py. If it can. Since there are a handful of web2py featured I >> won't even use. I don't need them to be auto imported if I'm not using them >> (since I can't see what's being imported). So in a way it feels like bloat. >> A reason I don't like django. >> >> What do you guys think? Any input is greatly appreciated. >> > --
