Most of the BREW patches look fine. I'm happy to review them once there is consensus on the list that WebKit is ready and willing to accept a BREW port.
-eric On Thu, Jan 14, 2010 at 5:26 PM, Eric Seidel <[email protected]> wrote: > I don't feel like this question was ever answered. > > Folks seem to be moving forward with setting up infrastructure for a > real port (which is good), but at least this question still remains. > > Also, does the BREW port already have a DumpRenderTree implementation? > When should we expect such? > > -eric > > On Wed, Jan 13, 2010 at 1:27 PM, Holger Freyther <[email protected]> wrote: >> On Wednesday 13 January 2010 18:23:21 Darin Adler wrote: >>> Someone is porting WebKit to Qualcomm’s BREW. And there are many patches >>> for that port; now a significant fraction of the unreviewed WebKit >>> patches. Who’s going to review these? Is this a one-time code drop or is >>> there an intent to maintain this port ongoing? Does the test suite work on >>> the BREW platform yet? Will someone maintain a buildbot? >>> >>> I won’t be reviewing these patches myself until I know the answers to some >>> of those questions. >> >> Last time I checked one needs to have a contract with Qualcomm (NDA) to get >> information (header files, documentation) that is beyond marketing bla bla. >> >> I would be interested if we are allowed to host and distribute the sourcecode >> that has used information which is under a NDA. >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> webkit-dev mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/webkit-dev >> > _______________________________________________ webkit-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/webkit-dev
