On Jun 3, 2011, at 5:46 PM, Peter Kasting wrote:
> From the perspective of Node itself, I'm not sure why this would be a "big
> task". There shouldn't be any const accessors that return non-const pointers.
> Simply removing the "const" qualifier on all the above accessors would make
> things correct, at the expense of possibly making it difficult to use a const
> Node*.
Maybe you can give it a try and report back. I think you’ll find that this is
an enormous task.
-- Darin
_______________________________________________
webkit-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/webkit-dev
