On Jun 8, 2011, at 11:48 AM, Peter Kasting wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 7, 2011 at 11:18 PM, Maciej Stachowiak <[email protected]> wrote:
>> 1) We definitely have consensus to fix the broken non-logically-const
>> accessors by making them non-const; consensus on also adding const accessors
>> is less clear.
>
> There are a surprising number of places that actually do const traversals.
> Simply making all these accessors non-const will require removing a lot of
> valid const usage from the existing code. I'm really uncomfortable with that.
I thought you did it already locally. You mentioned that you decided for many
member functions that the right thing was to remove const. I suggested you land
those changes first, before making the other changes.
Are we talking about the same thing? Maybe you think Maciej is asking for
something he’s not.
-- Darin
_______________________________________________
webkit-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/webkit-dev
