On Fri, Jun 13, 2014 at 2:05 AM, Ryosuke Niwa <rn...@webkit.org> wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 13, 2014 at 1:53 AM, Anne van Kesteren <ann...@annevk.nl> > wrote: > >> On Fri, Jun 13, 2014 at 10:32 AM, Ryosuke Niwa <rn...@webkit.org> wrote: >> > I understand your concern and sentiment but I'm having a hard time >> imagining >> > what kind of problems/concerns would TC39 have with these interfaces >> that >> > are clearly prefixed with DOM. >> >> That if they end up as objects in JavaScript engines they end up >> leaking outside of browsers affecting other parts of the JavaScript >> ecosystem. (And actually, we do run new APIs by TC39 for review, so if >> these have passed for review on public-script-co...@w3.org, perhaps >> calling out this implementation tactic, that might be sufficient.) >> > > If that were the concern, we can simply add a private API that WebCore > uses to enable these objects at run time. > Having said that, it would be much cleaner to improve our binding code and do it in WebCore. - R. Niwa
_______________________________________________ webkit-dev mailing list webkit-dev@lists.webkit.org https://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo/webkit-dev
