On Fri, Jun 13, 2014 at 1:27 AM, Dirk Schulze <dschu...@adobe.com> wrote:
> >> On Jun 13, 2014, at 10:17 AM, "Anne van Kesteren" <ann...@annevk.nl> > wrote: > >> > >> On Fri, Jun 13, 2014 at 10:12 AM, Ryosuke Niwa <rn...@webkit.org> > wrote: > >> What I'm saying is that we can implement it in JavaScriptCore for > >> performance and we still make it look like a regular DOM object with > >> wrappers to preserve the semantics. > > > > I understand that, but given that it is in the JavaScript engine at > > that point, they cannot realistically standardize on a different > > abstraction later on. And I got the impression typed arrays caught > > them off guard, so giving them a heads up this time around might be > > good. > > Blink is slowly moving the DOM into the JS engine. That doesn't make the > DOM part of ECMAScript or needs approval of TC39. I do not think that typed > arrays can be compared to DOMPoint or DOMMatrix. But DOMPoint to the plans > of implementing DOM in JSC. > > I am interested in implementing the geometry interfaces into JSC. I wonder > if we could generate the code from IDL as well. I do not think that this is > possible with our code generators today. Is it? > I bet we can make sufficient improvements to our code generator such that these objects are as fast as pure JavaScript objects but I don't think it does so today as far as I looked at. - R. Niwa
_______________________________________________ webkit-dev mailing list webkit-dev@lists.webkit.org https://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo/webkit-dev