On Friday, March 30, 2012 01:55:10 PM ext Osztrogonac Csaba wrote: > Hi All, > > I updated the Qt5 on the Qt5 WK1/WK2 buildbots, WK2 EWS and on the WK2 perf > bot. The new Qt5 hash is 74f7b7f74c0e9ce99123fc836fd22f1f0b5688fe (Thu Mar > 29 16:17:33 2012 +0200) > > You can find the updated build script here: > https://github.com/ossy-szeged/qt5-tools > > But unfortunately there are two regressions: > - [Qt] WK1/WK2 layout test results are diverging - > https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=82720 After update WK1 tests > started to fail, so now the test coverage on Qt5-WK1 is 0% :( > > - [Qt][WK2] REGRESSION, fix a failing API test in qmltests - > https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=82700 After update a Qt5-WK2 API > test started to fail > > My question is what do you think about these regressions? Should we go back > to the previous pinned Qt5 hash or not? Is there any volunteer to dig/fix > these regressions?
Let's go back to the previous Qt5 hash, I think a 0% test coverage is a perfectly good reason to revert back. Simon _______________________________________________ webkit-qt mailing list [email protected] http://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/webkit-qt
