Hi,
Osztrogonac Csaba írta:
Hi All,
I updated the Qt5 on the Qt5 WK1/WK2 buildbots and on the Qt5 WK1/WK2
performance bots.
Additional buildfixes landed in WebKit trunk:
- http://trac.webkit.org/changeset/116100
- http://trac.webkit.org/changeset/116101
- http://trac.webkit.org/changeset/116102
You can find the updated build script here:
https://github.com/ossy-szeged/qt5-tools
New "weekly" Qt5 hash is 88442f81edb4464cc88ac7c970333e7e59f1d200 (Fri
May 4 13:16:52 2012 +1000)
And please update your testfonts too, it is necessarry to run Qt5-WK1
layout tests.
Unfortunately there are layout test regressions. :-/
I'm filing bugs right now and will skip the failing tests.
I finished with filing bug reports and skipping tests to paper over the
new regressions: (and to make buildbots be able to catch new regressions!)
- [Qt] REGRESSION: 10 tests started to fail with newer Qt5
https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=85629
- [Qt] REGRESSION: 350 tests started to fail with newer Qt5-WK1
https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=85631
- [Qt] REGRESSION: http/tests/xmlhttprequest/basic-auth-nopassword.html
started to crash with newer Qt5
https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=85632
Nowadays I have a strange feeling, that regressions/crashes in QtWebKit don't
matter at all.
I'd be happy if I'm wrong, but the following meta bugs history cuts a poor
figure:
- meta bug for fixing crashes/assertions/timeouts with very very long
depends on list: https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=79666
- meta bug for fixing "lighter" regressions, which cause only layout test
failures
with very very long depends on list:
https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=79666
br,
Ossy
_______________________________________________
webkit-qt mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/webkit-qt
