Hi,
Simon Hausmann írta:
On Friday, March 30, 2012 01:55:10 PM ext Osztrogonac Csaba wrote:
Hi All,
I updated the Qt5 on the Qt5 WK1/WK2 buildbots, WK2 EWS and on the WK2 perf
bot. The new Qt5 hash is 74f7b7f74c0e9ce99123fc836fd22f1f0b5688fe (Thu Mar
29 16:17:33 2012 +0200)
You can find the updated build script here:
https://github.com/ossy-szeged/qt5-tools
But unfortunately there are two regressions:
- [Qt] WK1/WK2 layout test results are diverging -
https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=82720 After update WK1 tests
started to fail, so now the test coverage on Qt5-WK1 is 0% :(
- [Qt][WK2] REGRESSION, fix a failing API test in qmltests -
https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=82700 After update a Qt5-WK2 API
test started to fail
My question is what do you think about these regressions? Should we go back
to the previous pinned Qt5 hash or not? Is there any volunteer to dig/fix
these regressions?
Let's go back to the previous Qt5 hash, I think a 0% test coverage is a
perfectly good reason to revert back.
Simon
OK, I made the bots (perf bots, EWS, build bots) to use the previous
Qt5 hash: 7d0327830bb4768753cb0c14a23d98fed08be7d2 until proper fix.
_______________________________________________
webkit-qt mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/webkit-qt
