INdT will join. We'll focus the entire week on getting bugs fixed, no new features.
On Sat, May 5, 2012 at 4:49 AM, Zeno Albisser <[email protected]> wrote: > > > On May 4, 2012, at 7:44 PM, [email protected] wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> >> A lot of these regressions are also due to behavioral changes in Qt, but >> they still end up as regressions because >> they require us to change the way we use Qt. >> >> Ossy is right, this is getting way to big and we're running risk of >> destabilizing our foundations. At the same time >> new features are being implemented at a rapid pace (maybe it's catching up >> with other ports or implementing >> WebCore interfaces, but they're still new features). >> >> We are now in week 18. How about we target week 20 for an concentrated >> effort of getting our test coverage back up? (that gives >> a week to finish your pending features ;) >> >> Who's in? :) >> > > me. :) > >> >> >> Simon >> >> ________________________________________ >> From: [email protected] >> [[email protected]] on behalf of ext Osztrogonac Csaba >> [[email protected]] >> Sent: Friday, May 04, 2012 18:50 >> To: [email protected] >> Subject: Re: [webkit-qt] qt5 version updated for bot / development >> >> Hi, >> >> Osztrogonac Csaba írta: >>> Hi All, >>> >>> I updated the Qt5 on the Qt5 WK1/WK2 buildbots and on the Qt5 WK1/WK2 >>> performance bots. >>> >>> Additional buildfixes landed in WebKit trunk: >>> - http://trac.webkit.org/changeset/116100 >>> - http://trac.webkit.org/changeset/116101 >>> - http://trac.webkit.org/changeset/116102 >>> >>> You can find the updated build script here: >>> https://github.com/ossy-szeged/qt5-tools >>> >>> New "weekly" Qt5 hash is 88442f81edb4464cc88ac7c970333e7e59f1d200 (Fri >>> May 4 13:16:52 2012 +1000) >>> >>> And please update your testfonts too, it is necessarry to run Qt5-WK1 >>> layout tests. >>> >>> Unfortunately there are layout test regressions. :-/ >>> I'm filing bugs right now and will skip the failing tests. >> >> I finished with filing bug reports and skipping tests to paper over the >> new regressions: (and to make buildbots be able to catch new regressions!) >> - [Qt] REGRESSION: 10 tests started to fail with newer Qt5 >> https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=85629 >> - [Qt] REGRESSION: 350 tests started to fail with newer Qt5-WK1 >> https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=85631 >> - [Qt] REGRESSION: http/tests/xmlhttprequest/basic-auth-nopassword.html >> started to crash with newer Qt5 >> https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=85632 >> >> Nowadays I have a strange feeling, that regressions/crashes in QtWebKit >> don't matter at all. >> I'd be happy if I'm wrong, but the following meta bugs history cuts a poor >> figure: >> - meta bug for fixing crashes/assertions/timeouts with very very long >> depends on list: https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=79666 >> - meta bug for fixing "lighter" regressions, which cause only layout test >> failures >> with very very long depends on list: >> https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=79666 >> >> br, >> Ossy >> _______________________________________________ >> webkit-qt mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/webkit-qt >> _______________________________________________ >> webkit-qt mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/webkit-qt > _______________________________________________ > webkit-qt mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/webkit-qt -- Alexis Menard (darktears) Software Engineer openBossa @ INdT - Instituto Nokia de Tecnologia _______________________________________________ webkit-qt mailing list [email protected] http://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/webkit-qt
