On 05/07/2012 05:30 PM, Alexis Menard wrote:
INdT will join. We'll focus the entire week on getting bugs fixed, no
new features.
Szeged joins as well. ;)
On Sat, May 5, 2012 at 4:49 AM, Zeno Albisser<[email protected]> wrote:
On May 4, 2012, at 7:44 PM, [email protected] wrote:
Hi,
A lot of these regressions are also due to behavioral changes in Qt, but they
still end up as regressions because
they require us to change the way we use Qt.
Ossy is right, this is getting way to big and we're running risk of
destabilizing our foundations. At the same time
new features are being implemented at a rapid pace (maybe it's catching up with
other ports or implementing
WebCore interfaces, but they're still new features).
We are now in week 18. How about we target week 20 for an concentrated effort
of getting our test coverage back up? (that gives
a week to finish your pending features ;)
Who's in? :)
me. :)
Simon
________________________________________
From: [email protected] [[email protected]]
on behalf of ext Osztrogonac Csaba [[email protected]]
Sent: Friday, May 04, 2012 18:50
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [webkit-qt] qt5 version updated for bot / development
Hi,
Osztrogonac Csaba írta:
Hi All,
I updated the Qt5 on the Qt5 WK1/WK2 buildbots and on the Qt5 WK1/WK2
performance bots.
Additional buildfixes landed in WebKit trunk:
- http://trac.webkit.org/changeset/116100
- http://trac.webkit.org/changeset/116101
- http://trac.webkit.org/changeset/116102
You can find the updated build script here:
https://github.com/ossy-szeged/qt5-tools
New "weekly" Qt5 hash is 88442f81edb4464cc88ac7c970333e7e59f1d200 (Fri
May 4 13:16:52 2012 +1000)
And please update your testfonts too, it is necessarry to run Qt5-WK1
layout tests.
Unfortunately there are layout test regressions. :-/
I'm filing bugs right now and will skip the failing tests.
I finished with filing bug reports and skipping tests to paper over the
new regressions: (and to make buildbots be able to catch new regressions!)
- [Qt] REGRESSION: 10 tests started to fail with newer Qt5
https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=85629
- [Qt] REGRESSION: 350 tests started to fail with newer Qt5-WK1
https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=85631
- [Qt] REGRESSION: http/tests/xmlhttprequest/basic-auth-nopassword.html
started to crash with newer Qt5
https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=85632
Nowadays I have a strange feeling, that regressions/crashes in QtWebKit don't
matter at all.
I'd be happy if I'm wrong, but the following meta bugs history cuts a poor
figure:
- meta bug for fixing crashes/assertions/timeouts with very very long
depends on list: https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=79666
- meta bug for fixing "lighter" regressions, which cause only layout test
failures
with very very long depends on list:
https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=79666
br,
Ossy
_______________________________________________
webkit-qt mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/webkit-qt
_______________________________________________
webkit-qt mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/webkit-qt
_______________________________________________
webkit-qt mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/webkit-qt
_______________________________________________
webkit-qt mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/webkit-qt
