On Wednesday, May 09, 2012 09:00:11 AM ext Alexis Menard wrote: > On Wed, May 9, 2012 at 6:02 AM, Simon Hausmann <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi, > > > > After a few emails, let me formulate a concrete proposal: > > > > (1) Andrea Diamantini maintains an up-to-date port of WebKit that runs > > with Qt 4, on gitorious.org. > > That needs to be properly announced to a blog post no?
Yes, good idea. If we do this, then I'll write a blog entry about it. > > (2) End of May we remove Qt 4 code paths from WebKit trunk. > > Yaheeee! > > > (3) We replace the Qt 4 based bot on build.webkit.org with the Qt 5 one > > (hosted on Amazon, right?) > > What about the others? Windows/Minimal/ARM/Apple SL. > > Ok granted we need to move them to Qt5, but we need somehow a version > to stick with Qt5 otherwise every week updating to the current hash > will take a lot of time / ressources. So what about moving them to Qt5 > when Qt5 reach beta? Good point and good idea :) Simon > That is a starting point for all of us to stabilize. > > > (4) After that we rename the QtWebKit module (and thus library) in > > trunk > > to QtWebKitWidgets. That's no change in the directory structure or file > > names, just build system changes. This gives us the option of introducing > > a new QtWidgets-free "QtWebKit" module later during the life-time of Qt > > 5, essentially realizing a library split where QtWebKitWidgets would link > > against the new QtWebKit. (Note that this change doesn't affect anyone > > using the QML2 WK2 APIs, as those don't require direct linkage but only > > use dynamic plugin imports) > > > > > > Thoughts? :) > > > > > > > > Simon > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > webkit-qt mailing list > > [email protected] > > http://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/webkit-qt _______________________________________________ webkit-qt mailing list [email protected] http://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/webkit-qt
