On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 4:55 AM, Allan Sandfeld Jensen <[email protected]> wrote: > On Wednesday 09 May 2012, Simon Hausmann wrote: >> Hi, >> >> After a few emails, let me formulate a concrete proposal: >> >> (1) Andrea Diamantini maintains an up-to-date port of WebKit that runs >> with Qt 4, on gitorious.org. >> >> (2) End of May we remove Qt 4 code paths from WebKit trunk. >> >> (3) We replace the Qt 4 based bot on build.webkit.org with the Qt 5 one >> (hosted on Amazon, right?) >> > After some thought, I think we should maintain atleast one stable desktop > version of QtWebKit in trunk, and I believe Lars already officially stated > that Qt 5.0 will not be fully ready for the desktop, so I suggest we maintain > QtWebkit for Qt 4.8 until Qt 5.x is deemed ready for the desktop.
Well he said Qt 5 + QML. QWidget is still there rocking as he was. So Qt5 + Desktop is working fine if you rely on QWidget which is what WK1 is relying on. > > Since we only support Qt 4.8 for WebKit1 where not that much development is > happening, how much would we gain in dropping that support anyway? Stuff like that could be avoided : https://bugs.webkit.org/attachment.cgi?id=140979&action=review > > `Allan > _______________________________________________ > webkit-qt mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/webkit-qt -- Alexis Menard (darktears) Software Engineer openBossa @ INdT - Instituto Nokia de Tecnologia _______________________________________________ webkit-qt mailing list [email protected] http://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/webkit-qt
