On 8/28/06, Ashley Aitken <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I think there is close to zero (very close to zero ;-) chance that Apple will rewrite any of the WebObjects documentation to include the open source community tools. I think there is almost zero (somewhat near zero ;-) chance that Apple will write any more general documentation for WebObjects (besides the API docs generated by JavaDoc). I don't think Apple is going to exert any effort to develop "new" WebObjects developers, but obviously won't mind if the community does. Of course, Apple may do otherwise but if they don't then I think this is a clear message about how Apple values WebObjects and sees its future.
I'll weigh in here and say that I pointedly asked this question of documentation of the "other" tools (WOLips/Eclipse/EntityModeler) and if the documentation writer at Apple would still be involved in this transition. It was made clear to me that it would need to be a community based effort, not an Apple one. Since the answer was concerning what the community needs to do, I feel this was meant to be disclosed.
Cheers, Ashley. -- Ashley Aitken Perth, Western Australia mrhatken at mac dot com Skype Name: MrHatken (GMT + 8 Hours!) _______________________________________________ Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored. Webobjects-dev mailing list (Webobjects-dev@lists.apple.com) Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/webobjects-dev/jmlittle%40gmail.com This email sent to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
_______________________________________________ Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored. Webobjects-dev mailing list (Webobjects-dev@lists.apple.com) Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/webobjects-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com This email sent to archive@mail-archive.com
