On 9/5/06, Joe Little <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 9/5/06, Karl Gretton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The only danger of using Eclipstick is that someone might come up
> with something to suggest that we are trying to put lipstick on the
> PIG...which WO clearly is NOT!
>
> I personally liked this cover: http://static.flickr.com/
> 70/197986751_d4bd745e2c_m.jpg
>
> We should surely come up with a .NET v3.0 version of this (or Ruby on
> Rails ;-P)
One can always do better.
Shameless: woogle (web objects official graphical linker + editor)
world: web objects rapid linking designer
better, but would confuse: word: web objects rapid designer
direct.. "wove": Web Objects View Editor
Use wove to weave your web :)
WOve could be better stated as Web Objects Visual Editor, but I went
with the MVC bit initially.
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list (Webobjects-dev@lists.apple.com)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/webobjects-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
This email sent to archive@mail-archive.com
