I was on the Pixar presentation by Dr. M.B.Johnson and
after it I asked him about the web technologies behind
their web2 apps.
It's php/python for server-side web app, perforce for
their file-version storage and a bd (oracle(?)).
The client side apps mainly use Ext and some more
custom javascript.

Can you tell us more about Ext and how easy (or not)
it is to integrate with WO ?  how does it compare to
prototype ? what are the main design principle that
make it a good library ?

- jfv


--- Ricardo Parada <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a écrit :

> 
> On Jun 11, 2008, at 1:09 PM, Tom M. Blenko wrote:
> 
> > If the Ajax invokes a WebObjects direct action,
> fine, but my guess  
> > is that's just because that was something already
> there, or the  
> > quickest way to the data, not because anyone is
> pushing or promoting  
> > WebObjects.
> 
> 
> Hmm... I don't think that's because that is
> something that is already  
> there.  :-)  Choosing the architecture for the back
> end is not  
> something to be taken lightly.
> 
> My intuition tells me.... If Apple is using
> WebObjects for the "mobile  
> me" applications back end, then it means that they
> (like many of us in  
> this list) understand the power of the WebObjects
> component  
> architecture.   Not that I need their endorsing
> much, but it's good to  
> know that Apple and I agree.  I love WebObjects. 
> :-)
> 
> Ajax in combination with component actions are
> really attractive to  
> me, and so is the whole component and
> object-oriented architecture in  
> WebObjects.  It was developed so many years ago at
> NeXT and I can see  
> there was some really great design behind it.
> 
> Now, just to be clear, I don't know if Apple is
> using WebObjects for  
> the "mobile me" apps.  The "mobile me" apps have yet
> to be released to  
> the public, but I do know that WebObjects is used
> for the .mac webmail  
> app which is very similar to the mobile me version
> demoed at the  
> keynote.  All it takes to find out is to look at the
> URLs for the  
> application.   ;-)
> 
> I'm not really interested much on the client side. 
> I know they are  
> using JavaScript and I'm familiar with a lot of
> options there  
> (prototype, jquery, Ext, sproutcore).  And as Simon
> pointed out it  
> looks like Apple may be using
> http://www.sproutcore.com.
> 
> But the part I was interested in is how they
> integrate their front end  
> with component actions in WebObjects.  Basically, if
> they are building  
> that into WebObjects then I'm interested.  That may
> be just what I  
> need to make me decide to attend WWDC09 next year. 
> ;-)
> 
> I also think that the Ajax framework shown by Mike
> Schrag is awesome.   
> And that can be used today and there's no need to
> wait.
> It is actually very similar to an Ajax framework I
> developed myself.   
> The core components such as the ajax update
> container, ajax update  
> link, etc. are very similar to mine.  I developed
> mine thanks to  
> Chuck's book (Chapter 6).
> 
> Mine does partial form submits just like the one
> demoed by Mike.    
> Mine however, uses the ext.js javascript library. 
> The framework is  
> really small and has no dependencies.  So I kinda
> like mine.
> 
> But I don't like reinventing the wheel.  So I could
> adopt the  
> ERExtensions framework which I believe is all that's
> needed for  
> integrating Ajax into WebObjects.  Or I could
> continue developing my  
> framework.  Or I could wait to see what Apple is
> doing.
> 
> When I developed my Ajax framework I found out that
> it would have been  
> easier if WebObjects had provided some hooks.  But
> it was doable.  It  
> was just a bit more work.   And it works today.  And
> so does the Ajax  
> framework demoed at WOWODC by Mike.  So that's just
> proof that it can  
> be done in the existing WebObjects library (5.3.3
> and 5.4.x).
> 
> Anyways, if apple is doing something I pay
> attention.  But I guess  
> I'll have to go to WWDC next year or wait for a
> future WO version that  
> has that in it and fully documented.  :-)  Am I
> dreaming too  
> much?  :-) :-)
> 
> - Ricardo
> 
>  _______________________________________________
> Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be
> ignored.
> Webobjects-dev mailing list     
> ([email protected])
> Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
>
http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/webobjects-dev/jean_francois_veillette%40yahoo.ca
> 
> This email sent to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 


      À la recherche du cadeau idéal? Offrez Flickr!
http://www.flickr.com/gift/
 _______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list      ([email protected])
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/webobjects-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com

This email sent to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to