On 4. Dec. 2009, at 17:20 , Chuck Hill wrote: > On Dec 4, 2009, at 5:11 PM, Guido Neitzer wrote: >>> >>> AGAINST MySQL >>> - Lack of deferred constraints >>> - Lack of transactional DDL (roll back failing migrations for example). As >>> Mike pointed out, neither does Oracle, so not alone there. >> >> All toys ... :-P > > > Now, now Guido. Oracle is not a toy. It is a bloated, overpriced, creaky > piece of antique 1970's technology.
Hmmm. Fisher Price? Na, I know that Oracle is the enterprise' choice for DB tool - most of the time. And it also does seem to do this quite well. If you were actually allowed to post perf comparisons, we would even know how it performs for standard setups ... cug _______________________________________________ Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored. Webobjects-dev mailing list (Webobjects-dev@lists.apple.com) Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/webobjects-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com This email sent to arch...@mail-archive.com
