On 30-Jul-2010, at 3:57 PM, Valerio Luccio <valerio.luc...@nyu.edu> wrote:
> Farrukh Ijaz wrote: >> At first place I would avoid svning the tar as it is a binary file and even >> a minor change will change the binary and I guess every time the commit will >> recognize it as new file will commit the whole tar instead of differences, >> as a result it will start eating repository disk space very fast. I see plan >> C would be the best choice iff you can switch to hudson. Otherwise instead >> storing the tar, tag the successful revision. >> >> Farrukh > True, but I don't create tarballs that often and it's only 1.1 MB, storage > space is not an issue. I guess they could check out the code from dist just > as well, I'm not sure why I went down the tarball route ... Then go for plan B. Have a separate folder under your project and either generate the tar in it or move from dist to it. > > -- > Valerio Luccio (212) 998-8736 > Center for Brain Imaging 4 Washington Place, Room 156 > New York University New York, NY 10003 > > "In an open world, who needs windows or gates?" > > _______________________________________________ > Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored. > Webobjects-dev mailing list (Webobjects-dev@lists.apple.com) > Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: > http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/webobjects-dev/farrukh.ijaz%40fuegodigitalmedia.com > > This email sent to farrukh.i...@fuegodigitalmedia.com _______________________________________________ Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored. Webobjects-dev mailing list (Webobjects-dev@lists.apple.com) Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/webobjects-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com This email sent to arch...@mail-archive.com
