On 27/11/2010, at 2:42 PM, Jesse Tayler wrote: > On Nov 26, 2010, at 3:50 PM, David LeBer wrote: > >> Nothing to chip in on EC2. >> >> But we've are really enjoying working with linodes from Linode.com. > > really? > > I'm of no particular preference, and certainly could switch, but I saw the > wolastic image and it just seemed reliable.
I have not used either of the WOlastic images, and they may well be very reliable, but they do look a little old. (I think they're both dated July 2009.) I assume they pre-date EBS-based AMIs, too, as they're both S3-based. Again, they may be brilliant, I've just never used them. It's not too hard to roll your own. Simon McLean offers a public AMI (ami-de91bbaa) based on Amazon Linux in the eu-west-1 zone, and he's published a script that will bootstrap an application server from scratch: http://webobjects.s3.amazonaws.com/wo-install.sh > I can't imagine how anyone could complete a finished app deployment without > configuring the apache right? Am I to setup another OS image for apache and > website stuff? use wolastic image as just the app engine? It depends on your needs. A standard m1.small instance gives you 1.7G of RAM, so you can certainly run the appserver, webserver and database all on the same host if you want to start small. -- Paul. http://logicsquad.net/ _______________________________________________ Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored. Webobjects-dev mailing list (Webobjects-dev@lists.apple.com) Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/webobjects-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com This email sent to arch...@mail-archive.com
