Well, I grok groovy more than scala, but that isn't saying much. I just see Grails as getting everything right about Java (for the most part) and picking what was right about Rails. Liftweb seems to make my brain hurt, and Play is a minimal Grails without half the traction to getting things done.
On Thu, Mar 10, 2011 at 1:50 PM, Ray Kiddy <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Mar 10, 2011, at 1:29 PM, Anjo Krank wrote: > >> Just finished glancing through a Scala book... how do you implement faulting >> with it? You know: Bar bar = foo.getBar(). The only thing I saw is >> continuation-passing, which is async by nature? >> >> Cheers, Anjo >> > > In order to use WO stuff with Scala you basically have to remove many of the > ideas behind WO first. Every access to an object in EOF is done via one > enormous lock on the entire framework. If you want the benefits of using > Scala, you need to go to the old idea that every editing context will need > its own entirely separate EOF stack. There is an obvious mis-match in the > conceptual frames here.... > > I actually think it would be more interesting to see an implementation of WO > and EOF in Clojure. It would be harder for people to wrap their heads around > Clojure, but it it is a dynamic language like ObjC, and one could actually > implement the concepts of WO and EOF in Clojure instead of subverting them, > as one would have to do with Scala. > > - ray > >> >> Am 10.03.2011 um 21:18 schrieb Lachlan Deck: >> >>> lift (for scala) is pretty cool. >>> >>> http://liftweb.net/ >>> http://demo.liftweb.net/ >>> http://exploring.liftweb.net/ >>> >>> On 11/03/2011, at 3:25 AM, Joe Little wrote: >>> >>>> Grails is more similar to WO than Play though -- especially >>>> considering GORM approaches some of the niceties of EOF and Wonder >>>> qualifiers. Both easier in the easy case, but harder when you have >>>> multiple relationships (stuck with Hibernate criteria builders then) >>>> >>>> >>>> On Wed, Mar 9, 2011 at 7:17 PM, Pascal Robert <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Le 2011-03-09 à 20:57, Mike Schrag a écrit : >>>>> >>>>>> of the non-wo java web frameworks, Play is the only one that ever looked >>>>>> interesting to me ... definitely inherits a lot of "remove the crap" >>>>>> from rails, which is nice. i haven't built anything with it, but it >>>>>> looked like a nice framework from the docs and examples. >>>>> >>>>> It even have a basic D2W-like system : >>>>> >>>>> http://www.playframework.org/documentation/1.1.1/guide7 >>>>> >>>>>> ms >>>>>> >>>>>> On Mar 9, 2011, at 8:41 PM, Pascal Robert wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> I saw a demo of the Play! Framework (http://www.playframework.org) at a >>>>>>> conference today, and I must say that it's the first time that I saw >>>>>>> something that I really want to try out. It seems like a good mix >>>>>>> between Ruby on Rails and WO, so I was wondering if someone else here >>>>>>> have tried out that framework? >>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>>> Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored. >>>>>>> Webobjects-dev mailing list ([email protected]) >>>>>>> Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: >>>>>>> http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/webobjects-dev/mschrag%40pobox.com >>>>>>> >>>>>>> This email sent to [email protected] >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored. >>>>> Webobjects-dev mailing list ([email protected]) >>>>> Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: >>>>> http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/webobjects-dev/jmlittle%40gmail.com >>>>> >>>>> This email sent to [email protected] >>>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored. >>>> Webobjects-dev mailing list ([email protected]) >>>> Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: >>>> http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/webobjects-dev/lachlan.deck%40gmail.com >>>> >>>> This email sent to [email protected] >>> >>> with regards, >>> - >>> >>> Lachlan Deck >>> >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored. >>> Webobjects-dev mailing list ([email protected]) >>> Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: >>> http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/webobjects-dev/anjo%40krank.net >>> >>> This email sent to [email protected] >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored. >> Webobjects-dev mailing list ([email protected]) >> Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: >> http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/webobjects-dev/ray%40ganymede.org >> >> This email sent to [email protected] >> > > _______________________________________________ > Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored. > Webobjects-dev mailing list ([email protected]) > Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: > http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/webobjects-dev/jmlittle%40gmail.com > > This email sent to [email protected] > _______________________________________________ Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored. Webobjects-dev mailing list ([email protected]) Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/webobjects-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com This email sent to [email protected]
